THAT is the definition.
Now, here is an article from TOI:
"
|
Emphasis Added.
How can this be indigenously created when the parties involved have issued statements like:
|
Dikhaawon pe mat jaao… apni akal ladaao.
The cool people at College Humor have put in a lot of effort trying to explain the entire thing in simpler terms so even FaceBook users the dumb users might have a chance to understand it.
Sridevi, after all these years - refreshing.
I would say the film is watchable. Could have been a lot better. Probably I didn't like it as much because I was expecting something different from the film. Some parts are actually quite good, but that gets evened out by some rather over the top sequences. The cafe sequence was ridiculous.
Was extremely disappointed by the maker's bastardised version of Mind Your Language.
The article goes on to mention the film (on the subject of terrorism) A Wednesday (?!?!!) Waah! Kya connection nikaala hai (doob maro)!!
… If this isn't rock bottom for 'news' reporting, then what is?!
This isn't the first time anti RIM posts have been published. I will admit that at times, there have been valid reasons for bad-mouthing RIM and/or its products, [lack of] certain features/specifications. There have been posts where the sole reason for the rant is personal preference for another device.
But now it has come to a point where editors at Gizmodo will take up just anything about RIM and publish a negative post. I can't think of any reason why Casey Chan would put up this ridiculous post - Caption This Dumb Picture of RIM’s CEO Taking a Picture with a BlackBerry 10 Device at a Basketball Game.
Honestly, I don't see anything funny/confusing/'dumb' about the picture that seems to have caused Chan to have a laugh riot. That said, there ARE some pictures that I DO find dumb (see below). I wonder what Chan would have to say about these:
OR
SRK ghatiya filmen karta rahega… jab tak hai jaan, jab tak hai jaan.
The film successfully highlights the complete absence of logic in film-making. Crap. Don't watch.
Absolutely no character development. The film didn't have to be THAT long given that there really wasn't much of a story to tell or a plot to follow.
I didn't have a choice. I had to watch it (sister is a big fan… yes – same old story). BUT if you do have a choice - don't watch this crap.
In addition to finding this film stupid, illogical, and a complete waste of time – I also found it cheap. Not in terms of production value, but in the way some scenes/dialogues were shot.
I am definitely NOT a prude, but there are ways to depict scenes in a film so that they don't come across as crude/vulgar/cheap. At times film-makers get it right. At times they get it wrong. Then there are some cases where they intentionally get it wrong (shock value).
In my view, there were some scenes / sequences in this film that came across as cheap. It did seem (to me) that this was unnecessary and rather pathetic.
[Spoiler/Rant]
Samar moves from London. But before that he 'challenges' god. The whole thing is rather stupid, if you think about it. IF Samar really wanted to rubbish Meera's belief (rolls eyes), then all he had to do was snip off one wrong wire while defusing any of those 100 odd bombs that he had been attending to.
Samar would die, Meera-God Deal Making bullshit would be proved wrong. Samar would have made his point and won the argument. Of course, an added advantage would be – the film would have been significantly shorter.
But, as SRK would put it – Haar kar bhi jeetne waale ko baazigar kehte hain… he doesn't cut off the wrong wire. NOT ONCE!
The idiot doesn't understand that by staying alive he is further validating Meera's pointless argument.
Treating a patient suffering from Retrograde Amnesia – What would be a more 'sensible' option to help trigger the patient's memory?
Option 1 - Telling him the truth and exposing him (in a controlled / supervised manner) to the events/places/people that he seems to have forgotten.
Option 2 - Setting up an elaborate lie and convincing him about - Events that never happened. Life he never lived. Family that doesn't exist.
Had the intention been to 'trigger' Samar's memory – The doctors could have started off with showing him the 'documentary' that was filmed by Akira. Failing which, they could have given Samar the journal he has kept (in his own handwriting).
Surely these would have a better chance of triggering Samar's memory as opposed to the bullshit they ended up doing.
If one does opt for the second option – clearly the recovery of the patient's memory is NOT the priority. The priority (in this film) was possibly to give some more screen time to Katrina Kaif.
If the retarded morons film-makers would just use their brains, there could have been a much better way of accomplishing that (more screen time for Katrina) without using this illogical 'twist'.
I have read the news article a couple of times, and … I still find it difficult to swallow.
"
|
What nonsense! It's not as if the vehicles were commandeered in the course of a pursuit. They need the vehicles for monitoring / observing the state elections!
If the officials need cars, let them get the cars from the rental agencies. Lease them, rent them, buy them. You can't have cops confiscating private vehicles without the consent of the owner.
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
"
|
For now, BBM Voice is available ONLY over WiFi. No 2G / 3G / 4G support.
"
|
THAT time of the month OR another frustrated bitch wife OR just another crazy Republican??
"
|
Yawn…
"
|
Err… like the way Anna changes his mind after every other press conference / core group meeting?!? Nautanki saala.
In other news
"
|
As if to prove the point that Digvijay Singh was trying to make, Rakhi Sawant responded - "He will now know, what I can do. I am in talks with a lawyer and will definitely drag Singh to the court for insulting a woman. Why don't they concentrate on their work rather than talk about others in a derogatory manner".
I am not a fan of the politician, but I think Singh's tweet was pretty cool / funny.
BTW, I missed out on the TOI typo - Screenshot below:
Mustafa Zaidi…
Vo ahad ahad hi kya jise nibhaao bhi
Humaare vaada-e-ulfat ko bhool jaao bhi
Bhalaa kahaan ke hum aise gumaan vaale hain
Hazaar baar hum aayen humen bulaao bhi
Bigad chalaa hai bahut rasm-e-khudkushi ka chalan
Daraane vaalo kisi roz kar dikhaao bhi
Tumhaari neend mein doobi hui aankhon ki qasam
Humen ye zid hai ki jaago bhi aur jagaao bhi
"
|
The price – USD 1,130 for the Silver edition, or USD 1,990 for the Gold edition [Link].
What a waste…
Just wanted to point out that the poster is err… inspired.
About the film – Waste of time. The plot is… nothing much to talk about, really. The film is rubbish and the execution is pathetic.
Kareena 'can't act' Kapoor is her usual talentless self. I don't even think she is good looking. Nope, not even average. I find her ugly. But there are plenty who don't, so they can watch her pathetic attempt at 'dancing' while they listen to the horrid Halkat Jawaani item song (Thuuu… Some people have no taste).
Message for Madhur Bhandarkar – Phir puraani wahi kahaani… Same shit story, same crappy treatment, same nonsense, same gay/bisexual characters.
Seriously mate, have you ever interacted with a gay individual? This may come as a shock to you, but it is not a necessity for every gay man to behave like Karan Johar. Not every fashion designer / stylist is gay. And having a limp wrist is NOT a pre-requisite for being gay.
Why bother making films? You should consider working with Ekta Kapoor and churning out same crappy Star Plus soap episodes, day after day. And when you finally have a good story / plot – THEN make a film.
I have been trying really hard - for a few years now, to avoid putting up crap like this. But… just can't help it anymore. So here goes:
This was posted on a forum yesterday:
"
|
Not to put too fine a point on it, but… you were there. Did YOU get out and intervene?
[Rant]
It's not like YOU did anything about it. Other than sit and watch the 'live action'.
Perhaps I should give you the benefit of doubt.
Perhaps it wasn't your intent to highlight the 'no one gives a damn' or the 'why should I bother' attitude of the people. Perhaps you weren't criticising the attitude of the other motorists who did not jump to help the sparring parties or intervene to solve the problem. Perhaps you honestly just wanted to give an account of what you witnessed. Perhaps…
The primary reason for me not being able to extend the benefit of doubt to you is - THIS ISN'T the first time you have said or done something like this. I DO know you. We have interacted personally. I HAVE been reading your posts for YEARS now. I KNOW EXACTLY what you intended to highlight towards the end of that post.
Seriously mate, this is NOT cool. Stop it.
Dikhaawon pe mat jaao. Apni akal ladaao.
"
|
The cunts Panchayat is of the opinion that a girl and a boy can get connected / involved via mobiles and that may lead to unnecessary problems for the family.
For a second, let us all believe that there is absolutely no other way / medium through which a boy and girl may be able to get 'connected / involved'. Now my question to the 'elders' of Bhandarez is - Why prohibit just the girls from using mobile phones? Why not prohibit the boys as well??
Wouldn't it be 'ultimately for good' if the mobiles were taken away from the boys as well?
Bharat maata ki… (for the ones who want to make an issue over that phrase - its a song, you fucking retard).
Duniya mein chutiyon ki kammi nahin hai.
